Hindu, Hinduism, Hindustan, Hindus, Hindu Religion; ഹിന്ദു, ഹിന്ദുയിസം, ഹിന്ദുസ്ഥാൻ, ഹിന്ദുക്കൾ, ഹിന്ദു മതം.

The words “Hindu” (“ഹിന്ദു”), “Hinduism” (“ഹിന്ദുയിസം”), “Hindustan” (“ഹിന്ദുസ്ഥാൻ”) are the creation of foreigners such as the Persians, and the Arabs. The word “Hindu” (“ഹിന്ദു”), was first used due to the wrong pronunciation of the name of “Sindhu” (സിന്ധു) river. Then people living around “Sindhu” (സിന്ധു) river were identified as “Hindus” (ഹിന്ദുക്കൾ). Later the word (“Hindus”-“ഹിന്ദുക്കൾ”) was used to identify the people all over BhArath. Gradually the land where those “Hindus” (ഹിന്ദുക്കൾ) living was named “Hindustan” (“ഹിന്ദുസ്ഥാൻ”). The Greeks made it “India” (“ഇൻഡ്യ”). Countries to the East and North of India used to identify our land in slight variations of “India” in their languages. As Christians and Muslims came and started recruiting people into their religion, the remaining people (who did not join them) were continued to be identified as “Hindus” (ഹിന്ദുക്കൾ). Further down the history lane, those people who were called “Hindus” (ഹിന്ദുക്കൾ) were identified as people of “Hindu religion” (ഹിന്ദു മതക്കാർ). It was done because the foreigners had a religion, and they probably thought that our “sanAthana dHaRmmam” was a religion. More than that, it was a clear cheating by which they convinced people that it was a religion. Then they realized that having a greater number of religions in India is a very good tool to divide people into more groups and create distrust and infighting. So, they named some of our DeRShanams  (ദർശനങ്ങൾ) also as religions. Then, to increase the number further, few of our Deities (ishTadevathAs–ഇഷ്ടദേവതകൾ) were named Gods. The people who worship them were categorized as people of those religions. In fact, there were no religions with names such as “Hinduism”, “Buddhism”, “Jainism”, Shaivism, Vaishnavism etc. in India before this. This is how the “Indian born religions” were originated.

To achieve what they needed, the Europeans translated lots of our books wrong, incorporating proof of justification for their propaganda. They have used the British Education System to deprive us even the opportunity to learn our true history & true culture. Before the introduction of their Education Policy, they destroyed our ancient Education System through their administrative manipulations. The Education Survey they did from 1822 to 1825 was to collect information for this. Using this, along with the Aryan invasion story, made lots of changes to our truthful history. Then all the additions and alterations they made to our Books were fed to the world through the so-called encyclopedias. That Education System completely destroyed our ancient Knowledge Distribution System. Some people who worked on those projects did admit what they did. That list of people include Mr Max Muller and Mr Thomas Macaulay. Mr Macaulay, who was the main architect of the British Education Plan, in a letter to his Father who was a “Religious Amalgamation Worker” on 12^th October 1836, very clearly stated that his plans will make lots of Indians accept Christianity in about 30 years. He also stated that his plan will succeed where the European “Religious Amalgamation Workers” failed.

To authenticate religion and caste officially, ‘The Census Survey Workers’ were strictly instructed to list everyone into a religion and into a caste. Anyone who says they do not have a caste or religion, or do not know what their religion or caste is, the workers were instructed to give them one as the workers chooses. At that time, there were a lot like that, as these were not considered important, as they were only considered as professional and educational qualification recognizing tools. Because of the  above instructions lots of castes and some religions were created. In  fact, that was a ploy used to create more castes and religions. This is how some of the ishTadevathAs were made God and their worshippers listed into religions. In one Census Survey, the number of castes were increased to 106000. In fact, there were no religions with names such as “Hinduism”, “Buddhism”, “Jainism”, Shaivism, Vaishnavism etc. in India before this. This is how the “Indian born religions” originated. Through those Surveys they made them official too. And they sure showed that these religions and castes were there from time immemorial. The terms “Scheduled Caste” & “Scheduled Tribe” were created by them to further strengthen their “divide and rule” program through the “Census Surveys”.

“Caste”, “JAthi” and “VaRNam” are not the same. But they were made into one. For this also they used the “Census Surveys”. The “European Religious Amalgamation Workers” published dictionaries with wrong and inappropriate  meanings (the meanings they wanted to misguide people of India) and used some of the so-called ‘Pundits’ name to brand them authentic. Even they had paid some of them to incorporate fabricated “slokAms” into our “sanAthana dHaRmma” (“BraHMavidya”) books including BRhadaaraNyaka UpaniShad. They made lots of changes in the ‘Time Perished SmRitis’ and constantly propagated those parts where they made changes, so as to blemish India. They still do this. ManusmRithi is a clear example for this.

The “caste” and religious discriminations were imported into India by ‘European Religious Amalgamation Workers’, as it was practiced by them in their countries and superimposed on our culture. Those countries includes the pronounced christian countries like Spain, Portugal, Germany, Netherlands, and Italy where they practiced them with the sanction and authorization of the church.

The people who did these kind of work, besides Fredrich Max Muller includes J.D. Peterson, F. Wilford, William Jones, Charles Wilkins, Colin Mackenzie, Henry Thomas Colebrook, August William Schlegel, Horace Hayman Wilson, Franz Bopp, Eugene Burnouf, Theodor Benfey, Alexander Cunningham, Robert Caldwell, Monier Williams, Theodore Goldstucker, Rudolf Ruth, Albrecht Fredrich Weber, Edward Byles Cowell, William Dwight Whitney, Johan Georg Buhler, Vincent Smith, Hermann Georg Jacobi, George Abraham Grierson, Fredrick Eden Pargiter, Arthur Anthony MacDonnell, Maurice Bloomfield, Richard Karl von Garbe, Edward Washburn, Hopkins, Frederic William Thomas, Mark Aurel Stain, Moris Winternitz, Rudolf Otto, Arthur Berriendale Keith, Sidney Smith, B. H. Hodgson, Herbert Hope Risley, Colonel Boden, Ralph Turner, William Carey,  Robert Mortimar Wheeler, John Georg Buhler and Albert Fredrich Weber. There may be more unknown to us.

Here are two quotes from two books written by researchers on the subject. These quotes shows the assumed reason the Europeans used for practicing discriminations and the people against whom they did and how they did it. Quote 1 begins: “People from the traditional Christian families had pure blood, by virtue of them being born into the long line of good Christians. However, sincere the faith and practices of new converts could be, their blood was contaminated, because their ancestors believed in false religions. It was not desirable to allow marriages between these groups, because the blood of the children from such unions was also considered contaminated. As Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors made their way into the Americas, parts of Africa and Asia, this distinction was applied also to different groups of heathens: The children of marriages between Old Christians and New Christians (with Jewish or Moor blood), and their descendants were considered contaminated. When transferred to India, this principle included Indians, too. To say that someone had ‘race of Indian’, for example, was almost equivalent to saying that he or she was like a Jew or a Moor.” Quote 1 ends.

It is strange that they, on the one side, categorize their religion as a belief and on the other side claim purity of blood in it. How can belief which is a function of the mind have blood which is a physical or biological attribute? How can a belief contaminate the blood? It can only contaminate the mind and that contamination of mind is the reason for all kind of discriminations, and even this kind of thinking, in the name of beliefs.

Quote 2: Defiled tradesmen and their families were known as ‘Unehrliche Leute’, or ‘dishonorable people’. ……. . Dishonor was a legal and social distinction which did not necessarily convey any moral meaning - although it often did. Dishonor was a vaguely defined term that applied to widely disparate groups bound by little else than the stigma of dishonor: they included vagrants and criminals of all kinds, prostitutes, bastards, the prenuptially conceived, ethnic and religious minorities such as Jews or gypsies, those who had been made legally infamous by honor punishments, and a variety of occupations and trades. Social status was expressed in terms of honor in the early modem German society of orders (Stdndische Gesellschaft); to be denied status in this society meant to be denied honor. …………. . Executioners, skinners, grave-diggers, shepherds, barber-surgeons, millers, linen-weavers, sow-gelders, actors, latrine cleaners, night watchmen, and bailiffs were all defined as “dishonorable people” in this specific sense. Throughout the Holy Roman empire dishonorable tradesmen suffered various forms of social, economic, legal, and political discrimination on a graduated scale of dishonor at the hands of “honorable” guild artisans and in “honorable” society at large. ……………. . In the case of the most extreme dishonor, that of executioners and skinners, ‘Unehrlichkeit’ could lead to exclusion from virtually all normal sociability. Executioners and skinners might be pelted with stones by onlookers, they might be refused access to taverns, excluded from public baths, or denied an honorable burial. Dishonor was transmitted through heredity, often over several generations. The polluting quality of dishonor is one of its defining characteristics. By coming into casual contact with dishonorable people or by violating certain ritualized codes of conduct, honorable citizens could themselves become dishonorable.” Quote ends.

In spite of all these evidences, The British did all the manipulations to show India as the creator of caste discrimination and religious persecution. In fact, Europeans were the creators of both. One of the Censes Survey officials admitted this in writing. He stated “We pigeonholed everyone by caste and if we could not find a caste for them, labelled them with the name of hereditary occupation. We deplore the caste system and its effect on social and economic problems, but we are largely responsible for the system we deplore.” Here he is openly admitting that they changed occupation which was known as JAthi at that time into caste which they brought with them. If you study the Census Reports published by the then British government of India comprehensively, you can get very clear picture of all these.

Temples were there all over India from ancient times, at least from Saraswathi-Sindhu civilisation and people worshiped the “Ultimate” which is the “ParabRaHMam” (“പരബ്രഹ്മം”), through or in the form of their favorite deity (IshTadevetha - ഇഷ്ടദേവത). But there were no Buddhist Temples, because “Buddhists do not consider that there is an “Ultimate” such as “ParabRaHMam” (“പരബ്രഹ്മം”) and they do not worship anyone the way it is done in Temples. What followers of Buddha had ware “Buddha ViharaH”. The “samskRuitham” word “ViharaH” (വിഹാരഃ) means: play (ക്രീഡ), have entertainment (വിനോദം), and enjoy (ഉല്ലാസിക്കുക). Thus, that name indicates that, those “Buddhist ViharaH” ware for a learning process through entertainment and enjoyment, not through worship. Under these circumstances how can Buddha’s followers, who do not worship “ParabRaHMam” (“പരബ്രഹ്മം”) have Temple for worship? That is very much against Buddha deRshanam.

In Temples, Devatha is consecrated, not installed; and “Devatha” is the representation of “ParabRaHMam” (“പരബ്രഹ്മം”), which Semitic people propagate as God, which is wrong.

In the 1800s only, the westerners succeeded in propagating the degrading our “sanAthana dHaRmmam” into “Hindu religion” and then dividing it into more religions. That was a way to further blemish our culture and make people believe that what they renamed as “Hindu religion” in the 1800s, was only a religion started in the 1800s after Christianity and Islam were established. But there are millions of proofs to show that, “SanAthana dHaRmmam” was there from time immemorial. Those proofs will also show that, all religions all over the world are only fractional and misinterpreted adaptations of one of the philosophies within “sanAthana dHaRmmam”. Scientific dating of some “SanAthana dHaRmma deities” shows that they were created (built) more than 26000 years ago. But, for fact there is no “religion” by name “Hinduism”, “Buddhism”, “Jainism” etc. They are all part of “SanAthana dHaRmmam”, and that “SanAthana dHaRmmam” is much greater than any and every “religion”, even when all of them are put together. Shree Narayana Gurudevan very clearly stated that there is no “Hindu religion”. HE further stated that you could say “sanAthana dHaRMmam” is a collection of few “മതങ്ങൾ”, i.e. “opinions” of the greatest Rishis of all time. (The actual meaning of “മതം” is not “religion”, but “opinion”.) They (all our deRShanams) are the “opinions” of our RiSHis, and people have the freedom to choose what they want. There are no rules and regulations like in religions. That is why, after giving all the necessary knowledge, “sanAthana dHaRmmam” leaves the choice to each individual. But the choice has to be done after reflecting intelligently using the knowledge gained. Bhagawad Geetha very clearly states this. (The translation of “മതം” into “religion” is a very clear example of the westerners corrupting our languages by wrong translations and meanings.) Gurudevan has very explicitly demonstrated what is “sanAthana dHaRmmam” through every action of HIS and HIS literary works. The teaching institutions HE established are also clear proof for this.

Since ancient times, at least since Saraswathi-Sindhu” civilisation, there were “Temples” and “Temple Worship” in India. Since at least 600 B.Cs, in present day KeraLam, almost every family (മൂല കുടുംബങ്ങൾ) had a Temple. Some of the early visitors to India did record about Temples and Temple Worships. Also, early western “Religious Amalgamation Workers” did keep records of Temples. And as per their recordings, there were 19524 Temples in Travancore in 1816 and there were only 301 PaLLees (പള്ളികൾ) at that time. And in the same year another “Religious Amalgamation Worker” who worked in southern India for a long time had recorded in a letter as bellow. Quote begins: “The very name of Christian carries along with it the stain of infamy; and the proposal alone to become a convert to Christianity is considered by every well-bred Hindoo as a very serious insult, which is instantly resented, as I have witnessed in repeated instances. Such a proposal must always be made with the greatest prudence and circumspection, in order not to be exposed to severe reproof from those to whom it is addressed.” Quote ends. Yes, for anyone who studied sanAthana dHaRMmam properly, it is an insult to accept any religion. The “Religious Amalgamation Worker” came to know this and that was the reason they pushed through their education plan. And that plan denied people of India the opportunity to learn the true sanAthana dHaRmmam.

And elsewhere he also writes: Quote begins: “During the long period I have lived in India, in the capacity of a missionary, I have made, with the assistance of a native missionary, in all between two and three hundred converts of both sexes. Of this number two-thirds were pariahs, or beggars; and the rest were composed of sudras, vagrants, and outcasts of several tribes, who, being without resource, turned Christians, in order to form new connections, chiefly for the purpose of marriage, or with some other interested views. Among them are to be found some also who believed themselves to be possessed by the devil, and who turned Christians, after having been assured that on their receiving baptism the unclean spirits would leave them, never to return; and I will declare it, with shame and confusion, that I do not remember anyone who may be said to have embraced Christianity from conviction, and through quite disinterested motives. Among these new converts many apostatised, and relapsed into Paganism, finding that the Christian religion did not afford them the temporal advantages they had looked for in embracing it, and I am verily ashamed, that the resolution I have taken to declare the whole truth on this subject forces me to make the humiliating avowal, that those who continued Christians are the very worst among my flock.” Quote ends. The author of this letter came to India in 1799. This quote is from a letter he wrote to some of his co-workers in November of 1816. That means in seventeen years he could only recruit a maximum of 300 people. And this too was in spite of his unethical and deceptive covert operations of masquerading in disguise as a Swami with saffron cloths and other costumes to attract people to his religion. (Even now some of them do this). I do not think, We need another confession to show that they were only cheating the people, in the name of their religion, that too in more than one way.

The ‘Religious Amalgamation Workers’ frantically needed to change this situation shown in the above quote and that is why they resorted to all kind of tactics to divide the Indian community by any and every technique. They used all the tools in their governing administration, including fabricating almost every book connected to “sanAthana dHaRmmam” (braHMavidya). They inserted lots and lots of unfounded stories (absolute deceits) into our history. They stole lots and lots of our original manuscripts from Kanyakumari to Kashmir & from KhandahAr to Indonesia and beyond; and carried them away to their country along with our material wealth. To steal our literary wealth only they started Asiatic Society. With all these demeaning fabrications, they insulted and demoralized people. This made people despise for being a “sanAthana DhaRmmi” and some of them started accepting Christianity. For making this change in the attitude of people, their number one tool was the British Education System. Even though a good number of the people who went through that education, did not accept the foreign religions, still lot of them ceased to be “sanAthana dhaRmmis”. Because they become incapable to learn the true braHMavidya due to that schooling. Since so many of them, (quote begins): “who went through that schooling were made to suffer the elaborately organised ignorance that passes under the name of a ‘modern education’ — often dearly purchased for them by still pious but unsuspecting or complacent parents — have had their powers of discernment so disastrously upset that they seem no longer capable of receiving ideas through the medium of their own language; and their readiness to swallow quite uncritically the most hazardous hypotheses, even those relating to their own traditional doctrines, provided they have been put forward by some European sociologist or philosopher, is evidence of a state of mind that can only be described as defeatist; and among these people are to be found men of supposedly high standing and illustrious lineage, occupying responsible positions as rulers, leaders or instructors, but whose professed leadership is of the very essence of dependence and servility”. Quote ends. Because of these reasons, especially due to being “no longer capable of receiving ideas through the medium of their own language; and their readiness to swallow quite uncritically the most hazardous hypotheses, even those relating to their own traditional doctrines,” people of India are still suffering. And the present day atheists, rationalists, secularists, all kinds of communists and a good number of politicians are all the product of that schooling.

By 1891 the number of Temples in Travancore came down to 9364 from 19524 (in 1816) and churches went up to 1116 from 301. Some local rulers gave land, money, and other assistance to Religious Amalgamation Workers, to establish their houses of worship, keeping up with the traditional Indian hospitality. Also, The British started allocating land of Temples and government property to foreign religious denominations. Lots of their big name and small name early religious establishments started at that time are still located on such property. Mr Thomas Monroe was administrator of Travancore Temples for some time and that was the time most of it was given. Still they destroyed lots of Temples. These are the reasons for decline of number of Temples and increase in the number of Abrahamic institutions (പള്ളികൾ). And another fact is that some of them, (പള്ളികൾ), are located on the same spot of the Temple. The number of the Temples destroyed during European and Muslim invasions & rule in India were in thousands. Some examples in KeraLam were, Temples at തേവലക്കര (കൊല്ലം), പലയൂർ (ഗുരുവായൂർ), പള്ളുരുത്തി (കൊച്ചി) etc. Tippu has recorded in his own words about destroying more than thousand Temples in Malabar alone. Some of the Abrahamic institutions (പള്ളികൾ) still have some of the  deities and/or the murals of the deities on or inside of their walls and under the foundation like in Ayodhya and Agra. At least I know about one of them in a village near My native place in the old Travancore. Even though this is what happened, the “Religious Amalgamation Workers” and the Secularists propagate stories of “Hindus destroyed Buddhist Temples and Jain Temples” OR “Shaivites destroyed Vaishnava Temples” and vice versa. With all these kind of destructive work the rate of Christianization remained very low. Even in 1905 the ratio of Christian population to the total population was only seven to one thousand, that is just 0.7%. Thus, it is clear that only very few accepted Christianity even until 1900s. one among them has admitted that large majority of those few, who accepted their religion were beggars, sudras and outcasts. So, they decided to make more people beggars, sudras and outcasts.

The word “paLLi” (“പള്ളി”) has more meanings in addition to Abrahamic place of worship, such as “Royal Palace” (“രാജകൊട്ടാരം”-Residence of Royal Family), “Hut” (“കുടിൽ”), “Small Village” or “Small Town” (“ചെറിയ ഗ്രാമം അല്ലെങ്കിൽ പട്ടണം”), and “Public Buildings” (പൊതു ഉപയോഗത്തിനുള്ള കെട്ടിടങ്ങൾ) and so on.

Some people claim that there was a language named “Pali” (“പാലി”) and the word “പള്ളി” (“paLLi”) is from that language. They also say this “Pali” (“പാലി”) Language had no alphabets and grammar and used them both of samskRuitham. Then their claim cannot be true. There cannot be a word in “Pali” (“പാലി”) language as “പള്ളി” (“paLLi”) because there is no letter “La” (“ള”) in “Pali” (“പാലി”) or samskRuitham and both uses same alphabets. Thus it can only have letter “la” (ല). So, the word can only be “പല്ലി” (“palli”), which is not a “house of worship” but only a “house lizard”. So “പള്ളി” (“paLLi”) is not “PAli (“പാലി”) language word, but pure MalayALam word. “Pali” (“പാലി”) was just another dialect of samskRuitham. Its relation to samskRuitham is just like the relation of spoken MalayALam in KozikkOde or KaNNuur to that of literary MalayALam, slight variation in pronouncing. Creation of this story of “Pali” (“പാലി”) language as a separate language should also be understood with the propaganda about samskRuitham as a dead language, propagated by Europeans. That was another tool in distorting our history and braHMavidya to aid their Religious Amalgamation Work.

The British administration in India did everything for making more beggars outcastes and Sudras. In that process, Nair community was made into Sudras and Ezhavas who were also known as ChOn (ചോൻ) community (also known in some other names) was made into Buddhists immigrants from Shreelanka and Toddy Tappers. Ezhavas are the biggest community group in KeraLam now, and at the start of British rule they were even larger in number. (Majority of them were wealthy too). If they were all toddy tappers, KeraLam and perhaps southern part of the country should have been submerged in Toddy. In fact, they were a community with members, who were “shining stars” in almost every profession; from governing the country to day-to-day labor force. That included fields of Law Making, Governing, Medicine, Education including braHMavidya, Food Production, Manufacturing, and Defense of the land. This community was not limited to Travancore, KeraLam or India, but spread even beyond India. It was detected that genetically they are connected to the Jats of north India and some European communities. It should also be noted that the British even tried to list them as a separate religion. And  the reason for this might have been the versatility of their professions and their exceptional authority on those professions, which were the need of any nation for smooth functioning. The sections bearing the names such as, ChOn, Ezhavar, Shaannaar, Shaannaan, Eluvar, ELavar, Showndikar, Chaannar, ChOvan, ChEvakar, NADAr, Muthliyaar, Theeyar, Poojaari, Billavar, EDiga, Gattar, VeLLaaLar, Arachar, AnthaNar, VANikaL (ചോൻ, ഈഴവർ, ശാന്നാർ, ശാന്നാൻ, ഈലുവർ, ഈളവർ, ഈലവർ, ശൗണ്ടികർ, ചാന്നാർ, ചോവൻ. ചേവകൻ, നാടാർ, മുദലിയാർ, തീയർ, പൂജാരി, ബില്ലവർ, എഡിഗ, ഗട്ടർ, വെള്ളാളർ, അരചർ, അന്തണർ, വാണികൾ തുടങ്ങിയവ;) were all in it. The British backed off mainly due to the strong opposition of the Religious Amalgamation Workers, and decided to split them up and create more divisions. So, they listed all the above names, some as castes and some as sub-castes in the Survey Reports. This created infighting which sure helped them in recruiting people into their religion. The initial resistance they put-up against the Religious Amalgamation Workers, sure should be counted as one of the main reasons for keeping them as caste(s) with lots of sub-sections. And, with all that denigrating, humiliating, and demeaning propaganda (such as all the people of these caste(s) are poor, uneducated, unclean, Toddy Tappers); they leashed out about this community, sure got them more souls to harvest. Also, they got more donations for their religious amalgamation work from European countries. Later they got to even enroll them in large number. The jealousy, and the infighting induced & infused by that jealousy towards members of other communities and even to their own community members can still be seen, even now, at any sphere they co-exist.

There are other Gowthamapuram(s) in South India other than the one each in Kottayam and in Chennai. I lived in one other Gowthamapuram in Karnataka.

Please understand that “Temples” are not “shrines”. There was no “Buddhist Temples” anywhere before the British split our “sanAthana dHaRmmam” into religions. Buddha never started any religion, neither did Mahaveeran. And they were all named as religion and administratively back dated through Census Survey reports and other administrative tools by the British government. Shree Buddha and MahAveeran had “DeRShanam” and those “DeRShanam” only the Europeans and other foreigners termed as, and turned into “religions” like their “Islam” and “Christianity”. Shree Narayana Gurudevan also never did start a religion. But some people do propagate that HE did start one, and those people include some of the so-called followers of Gurudevan. In fact, HE very specifically stated that HE did not start a religion.

There cannot be any living entity without “VaRNam”. Even life less things have some qualities, and thus they too have “VaRNam”. So, the word “AvaRNnan” has no meaning. To understand this, people should know what “VaRNam” is. The word “Dalit” is also meaning less, if it is used for anything other than “Tree”. There is not even a letter “ള” in “samskRuitham”. The letter is “ല” and the word is “ദലിതഃ” not “ദളിതഃ” and the meaning of the word is “wood hammered into the soil”. And that word should only be is used in reference to wood & “tree”, as the root word indicates that it is concerning “Trees”, and not “Human beings”. Please do not make “Humans” into “trees”.

And “VaRNam” does not transfer from Father to children or Mother to children as large majority of people believe and propagate, including some of the so-called “Sanghees”. Proof can be seen in Rigveda. VaRNam is very well explained in UpaniShads including Bhagawad Geetha. “JAthi” also does not go from parents to children. “VaRNam”, “JAthi” and “caste” are not the same, even though “JAthi” and “VaRNam” have some relation. All the three were mixed up and made into one to create more divisions, confusion, and rift in the Indian population, mainly by Europeans.

And genetically almost all the people of Indian origin, are the children of same ancestors, and that include, all the so-called “JAthis”, who were pigeonholed in the name of “different castes”; from “Brahmin” (ബ്രഹ്മണൻ) to “Pariah” (പറയർ); & “Namboothiri” (നമ്പൂതിരി) to “NaayaaTi” (നായാടി), and all in between them. Of course, the census takers had pigionholes for all of them and they even had few bigger holes for the groups they labeled as “Indian born religions”.

Yes, our history is very much FABRICATED, it has to be written TRUTHFULLY and must be based on TRUTH alone. History should never be written to balance. It has been proven, (very clearly proven); that there was no Aryan immigration or invasion. It was also proven that the westerners created (with some help from easterners too) those fictional stories just to become superior people by propagating those stories. And all of it was written by the “balancing act” of the people who “balanced the history” and wrote it.

The so-called Aryans were the “Noble people” of India who immigrated to almost every part of the world. A person who was a Historian, Philosopher, Writer, Barrister, Academic, Administrator, and Judge, (all in one), a French citizen described that immigration in these words: (Quote begins) “Traversing Persia, Arabia, Egypt, and even forcing their way to the cold and cloudy North, far from the sunny soil of their birth; in vain they may forget their point of departure, their skin may remain brown, or become white from contact with snows of the West; of the civilizations founded by them splendid kingdoms may fall, and leave no trace behind but some few ruins of sculptured columns; new peoples may rise from the ashes of the first; new cities flourish on the site of the old; but time and ruin united fail to obliterate the ever legible stamp of origin.” (Quote ends) We can see the proof for what he says here that in Asia, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and The Americas.

© ഉദയഭാനു പണിക്കർ; ഇതു ഭാഗികമായോ പൂർണ്ണമായോ

ഉപയോഗിക്കേണ്ടവർ ലേഖകനുമായി ബംന്ധപ്പെടുക.

(This was originally written as a response to a blog by a person who always try to tarnish our samskRuithi.)

References:

(a) Western Foundations of the (Indian) Caste System, A collection of Articles by various authors. Published by Springer International Publishing AG, Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.

(b) Defiled Trades and Social Outcasts: Honor and Ritual Pollution in Early Modern Germany, By Kathy Stuart, Professor of History, Published by Cambridge University Press, 2006.

(c) Letters on the state of Christianity in India; In Which the conversion of the Hindoos Is Considered as Impracticable, By Abbe J. A. Dubois.

(d) Hindu manners, customs and ceremonies By Abbe J. A. Dubois, Translated and Edited With Notes, Corrections, And Biography By Henry K. Beauchamp.

(e) The bible in India. Part 4, by Louis Jacolliot, Published in 1869,

(f) Introduction To The Study of The Hindu Doctrines, By Rene Guenon.

(g) Caste of Mind; Colonialism and the making of modern India, by Nicholas B. Driks.

(h) Censes report of 1871, 1881, 1901.  1911, 1981. 

(i) The Tinnevelly Shanars: by Robert Caldwell.

(j) Origin of Primitive Superstitions By Rushton M. Dorman.

(k) Atlantis; The Antediluvian World; By Ignatius Donnelly.

(l) The Indian caste system and the British, by Kevin Hobson.

(m) Adam and the Adamite; Or, The Harmony of Scripture and Ethnology, by Dominic McCausland, Q.C., LL.D., published by Richard Bentley, New Burlington Street, London in 1868

(n) Destruction of The Indian System of Education, An article published in 'Bharathi', the cultural magazine of IIT-Madras contributed by V. Ravi Kumar (B. Tech, Mech. Eng..) based on a study of Kum. B. Nivedita's "The Tormented Indian Spirit- Redemption or Regression

(o) The Complete Works of Sister Nivedita, five volumes, Published by The Secretary. Ramakrishna Sarada Mission, Sister Nivedita Girls' School, S Nivedita Lane, Calcutta 7

(p) Essay on the Philosophy of the Hindus. Part V, Author(s): Henry Thomas Colebrooke, Source: Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 2, No.1 (1829), pp. 1-39, Published by: Cambridge University Press.

(q) The Asiatic Annual Register, Or A View Of The History Of Hindustan And Of The Politics, Commerce And Literature Of Asia For The Year 1799. By Campbell, Lawrence D., and E. Samuel, eds. For the Year 1799. London: J. Debrett.

(r) Asiatic Researches or Transactions of The Society Instituted in Bengal For Enquiring into the History and Antiquities, The Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia.

(s) The Origin and Families of Nations, speech delivered at Asiatic society on 23 February of 1792 by William Jones; Ninth Discourse delivered by him as its President.

(t) Institutes of Hindu law, or, The ordinances of Menu, by Sir William Jones.

(u) The Gods of Greece, Italy And India, By Sir William Jones., One of The Judges of Her Majesty’s Late Supreme Court, Fort William, Bengal, And First Published 1896 By the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Republished by Jogendra Nath Ghose, At Calcutta, and by J. Ghosh & Co., 57 & 59, Ludgate Hill, London.

(v) The Third Anniversary Discourse delivered about “Hindus” on February 2,

(w) Epochs of Indian history, Ancient India, 2000 B.C. to 800 A.D, By Romesh Chunder Dutt, I.C.S. Barrister-At-Law, Fellow of The University Of Calcutta, Member Of The Asiatic Society Of Bengal. Also, Author Of A History Of Civilization In Ancient India, Published By Longmans Green And Co., 39 Paternoster Row, London, New York And Bombay In 1904, Page 11,12,13.

(x) Asiatic Research Vol 1, Vol 3, Vol 5.